Frank Walker Law
  • Home
  • Attorney Profile
  • Criminal Defense
  • Personal Injury
  • Testimonials
  • Employment Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Call Today

    Call Today

  • Email Us

  • Our Map

  • Menu

    Home
    Attorney Profile
    Criminal Defense
    Personal Injury
    Pittsburgh Criminal Defense Blog
    Blog Comments
    Case Results
    Excessive Force
    Have You Been Arrested?
    Legal Tips
    Media Center
    Testimonials
    Video Center
    Free Legal Evaluation
    Employment Opportunities
    Contact Us
    Site Map
Call To Schedule An Appointment 412.212.3878 Phones Answered 24/7 West Virginia Criminal Defense Attorney
  • Best Law Firms in Americal
  • National Trial Lawyers: Top 40 Under 40
  • National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • American Association of Attorneys: Premier DUI
  • National Black Lawyers: Top 100
  • National Academy of Criminal Defense Attorneys
  • Global Law Experts
  • Rue Ratings: Best Attorneys of America
  • DUI Defense Lawyers Association
  • American Institue of Criminal Law Attorneys: 10 Best 2015 Client Satisfaction
  • National College for DUI Defense
Pittsburgh Criminal Defense Blog 2014 August Appellate Court Deems Pennsylvania Mandatory Sentence Statute 9712.1 Unconstitutional
Previous Post  |  Next Post

Appellate Court Deems Pennsylvania Mandatory Sentence Statute 9712.1 Unconstitutional

Posted By Frank Walker Law || 20-Aug-2014

Frank Walker Law Courtroom Pic

In recent years, Defendants convicted of crimes in Pennsylvania were subject to possible sentencing enhancements under 42 Pa.C.S.A. Section 9712.1. Essentially, if a person was convicted by a jury for possession with the intent to deliver narcotics, the prosecutor would present, at sentencing, evidence that the Defendant was also in close proximity of a firearm while in the course of dealing drugs. The burden of proof in both instances was on the Commonwealth. However, although the Commonwealth was required to prove to the factfinder the underlying crime beyond a reasonable doubt, the Commonwealth was only required to prove, at sentencing, to the sentencing judge, the evidence of the firearm only by the preponderance of evidence standard.

However, the United States Supreme Court Decision of Alleyne v. United States, ____ U.S. ______, 133 S.Ct. 2151 (2013) and the Pennsylvania Superior Court Decision of Commonwealth v. Newman, 2014 Pa. Super 178, (Pa. 2014), which was announced today, has rendered the mandatory sentencing structure of 42 Pa.C.S.A. Section 9712.1 unconstitutional and no longer workable without legislative guidance. The rationale is that the current mandatory sentencing structure "permits the trial court, as opposed to the jury, to increase a defendant's minimum sentence based upon a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant was dealing drugs and possessed a firearm, or that a firearm was in close proximity to the drugs."

Thus, the Newman decision now prohibits any mandatory sentencing based on the Commonwealth merely proving a fact by the preponderance of evidence standard. All facts, including sentencing enhancements, must be pled in the indictment and proved to the factfinder beyond a reasonable doubt.

Attorney Frank Walker of Frank Walker Law is a National Top 100 Criminal Defense Lawyer and Personal Injury Attorney with offices in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania and Morgantown West Virginia.

If you or someone you love are facing criminal charges or seriously injured in an accident, contact Attorney Frank Walker immediately at 412-315-7441, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for aggressive and experienced Criminal Defense or Representation in a Civil Case.

Categories: Community Announcements, Criminal Defense, Criminal Defense News

Share Post

Recent Posts

  • Why Allegheny County needs a new District Attorney
  • Having a Drink on St. Patrick's Day? Be Careful!
  • The Importance of Black History Month
  • The Dangers of Multiple DUI Convictions
  • The importance of having an Attorney when Charged with Sex Offense Crimes
  • Why do we Need Bail Reform in our Cirminal Justice System?
  • Should you represent yourself in a Criminal Case?
  • Why do we need Criminal Justice Reform?

Criminal Defense

How Can We Help You?

  • Do I Need A Criminal Defense Attorney?
  • Not from Pittsburgh?
  • Appeals
  • Criminal Defense FAQ
  • Arrest Warrants
  • Bail Bond Hearings
  • Bench Warrants
  • Casino Crimes
  • Conspiracy
  • Drug Crimes
  • DUI
  • Expungements
  • Fake ID
  • Federal Crimes
  • Grading Offenses
  • Internet Crimes
  • Juvenile Crimes
  • Kidnapping
  • Perjury
  • Pittsburgh College University Students
  • Preliminary Hearings
  • Probation Violations
  • Property Crimes
  • Prostitution and Promoting Prostitution
  • Public Urination
  • Resisting Arrest
  • Sex Crimes
  • Stages of Criminal Court
  • Summary Offenses
  • Theft Crimes
  • Traffic Offenses
  • Underage Drinking
  • Violent Crimes
  • Weapons - Firearms
  • Washington County

Contact Us Today

Request your free, confidential case analysis.

Send
My
Info
  • Home
  • Site Map
  • Nav Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
Frank Walker Law

Call Today (412) 212-3878

Frank Walker Law - Pittsburgh Criminal Defense Lawyer
3000 Lewis Run Road, Clairton, PA 15025 View Map
Main (412) 212-3878
Local (412) 315-7441
Website: http://www.frankwalkerlaw.com/
© 2023 All Rights Reserved.
Internet Marketing Experts